2011年8月21日 星期日

我的書單:畫個圖講得更清楚

點擊這裡連結到網路書店

本書特色
1.豐富而詳盡的圖解,讓內容輕鬆好吸收。
2.兼具原理與實務方法,不只教觀念,還能現學現賣。
3.不論主持會議、提案簡報、腦力激盪……都可以按圖索驥。
解釋老半天,不如隨手畫兩筆
用塗鴉、便利貼、手勢
讓台上台下看懂同一件事情
想到開會就嘸力?請服用「視覺會議」工具!
專治:啄龜、玩手機、裝隱形、沒意見……等症頭
功效:提神醒腦、活化腦力、增進發言、加強記憶
作者簡介
大衛.斯貝特(David Sibbet)
專長於圖像引導和視覺思考的團體運用,現為管理顧問公司The Grove Consultants International創辦人兼總裁,參與了蘋果電腦在1980年代的成長,並引導美國國家半導體(National Semiconductor)的變革管理團隊,在1990年代讓該公司起死回生。全球許多企業、政府單位、非營利機構、學校以及專業協會,都曾運用斯貝特所設計的工具和服務,用以進行全局思考、圖像引導、領導力培養以及組織轉型。
CC評價4顆星 (滿分是5顆星)

CC評論
:我最喜歡這本書的一句話是:(畫圖溝通)就像拿著筆比手劃腳一樣。這句話大大減低了我們心裡的障礙。我不善畫美術圖,但畫個圖來說明事物的觀念和結構還可以,不過除了寫論文,很少這麼做。前一陣子面談新人,有幾個中意的都沒來上班,反省後覺得自己在講述自己公司的現況和發展時,雖然講很多,但可能對方難以一下子消化那麼多的內容和其錯綜複雜的關係(我自己一直在思考和從事相關工作,所以一切脈絡分明、清清楚楚,別人卻有很多的關節打不通,不是他們的錯,果然我們在做的事還是有點料的,不然怎麼生存呢,哈哈),於是我改採邊畫邊說的作法(事先演練過以確定較佳的圖畫表達)。之後出現驚人的變化,凡是我中意的,面談之後都主動 email 表達他們對那份工作很有興趣,這是過去從來沒發生過的!可見畫個圖的確說的更清楚。
本書作者擅長以畫圖引導大型會議的進行,說真的,在那種場合,圖畫的好不好還是很重要,我沒被說服自己那麼做。也許找作者的團隊做還可以,這大概正是他想要的吧!呵呵!其實我最近幾年也沒有大型會議場合的應用機會。不過不管怎麼說,在小型會議和個人面對面的場合,藉著畫圖來夠通仍然是個很好的辦法。

本書另外提供了幾個常用的圖像模式,也頗有值得參考的地方,我想會另外找個機會介紹。


(我的書單所介紹的書,可能是我已經讀過又要重讀的,可能是我正在讀的,也可能是我計畫要讀但還沒讀的,總之,都是我覺得值得跟大家分享的。如果是我覺得已經讀通了的,時間也夠的話,我會另外分享我的筆記和心得。筆記和心得可能會在不同的時間、不同的分類出現,有興趣的朋友可以利用側欄的搜尋功能尋找。)


我的書單:自由書寫術

這裡可連結到網路書店

眼看提案截稿日分秒逼近,但你即使熬夜到天亮,還是等不到靈感來敲門?
明天就要向客戶做簡報,但你腦袋空空,擠不出有趣又吸引人的好點子?
從今天起,就用自由書寫,幫你激發出無限好創意!
  每個人都會遇上腦袋打結的時候!當你毫無靈感時,卻必須完成一份簡報、交出一份企畫、想出一堆文案,這時候難道你只能眼睜睜看著美好未來葬送在自己的「死腦袋」下?
  當邏輯思考無法幫你解決問題時,自由書寫(free writing)就是啟動腦袋轉個彎的好方法──只要針對眼前的主題,以最快的速度不停書寫,完全不要去管文法或用字是否正確。如此一來,你的腦袋來不及編修你寫出來的東西,你便能專注於問題的背景,得到讓人眼睛一亮的好點子與好辦法。
  多年來,作者馬克.李維便是利用自由書寫解決了這些工作上的問題,同時藉此得到了寫文章與部落格PO文的靈感。他指出,靈感不是一種天賦,而是一種練習,只要你能善用原本已在腦中的東西,就能將思緒的原料變成實用、甚至是非凡的點子。他以工作上遇到的難題為實例,包括策略、行銷、定位、業務、商業書寫等方面的問題,示範各種進行自由書寫的方式。不論你是遇到了寫作瓶頸、面臨緊迫的截稿壓力,或是不知該如何處理在腦中四處亂竄的絕妙點子,本書都能幫助你提升戰力,喚醒沉睡的思考,將想法化為文字,發揮源源不絕的創意!
本書特色
  1.書中每一重點都有實例與故事輔佐說明,清晰易懂,讓讀者輕易掌握釋放思考的技巧。
  2.從作者個人的實踐經驗出發,具有一定的說服力
  3.有具體的步驟,每章節最後還有強調學習重點或實踐演練的題目
作者簡介
馬克.李維(Mark Levy)
  行銷策略公司 Levy Innovation的創辦人,曾創下協助企管顧問與創業公司提高二十倍收入的紀錄。擔任過圖書經銷商的業務總監,幫助公司銷售價值超過十億美元的產品,並獲三次提名角逐《出版人週刊》舉辦的「年度最佳業務員」獎。
  此外,他也曾為《紐約時報》撰稿,並於羅格斯大學(Rutgers University)教授商業寫作,針對激發創意與自由書寫的主題四處演講。著有:《如何說服不想被說服的人》(How to Persuade People Who Don’t Want to Be Persuaded)、《頭腦的戲法》(Tricks with Your Head)、《傻瓜魔術教學書》(Magic for Dummies)。
CC評價5顆星 (滿分是5顆星)

CC評論:本書所述相當符合我個人的經驗,很多地方他說明的更清楚,也提供了更具體的建議,受教很多。雖然有些地方或措辭我不很同意他的說法,比如說他的秘訣十四,學習愛上說謊,我覺得那應該是學習從現實狀況之外以另一個觀點來思考其他的可能,用說謊這個字眼不但令人心生阻礙,也和本質的意義不很一致。儘管如此,我仍然以最大的熱誠推薦此書。


(我的書單所介紹的書,可能是我已經讀過又要重讀的,可能是我正在讀的,也可能是我計畫要讀但還沒讀的,總之,都是我覺得值得跟大家分享的。如果是我覺得已經讀通了的,時間也夠的話,我會另外分享我的筆記和心得。筆記和心得可能會在不同的時間、不同的分類出現,有興趣的朋友可以利用側欄的搜尋功能尋找。)

2011年8月12日 星期五

恩威要並濟


對員工,該要求的一定要要求,但是如果整天都是在要求,每天都是在要求,恐怕很少人能撐的下去,你也將無人可用!

有時需要要求的地方固然很多,特別是新人時期,但是切忌不要無時無刻的要求,有時也要鬆一下,給他喘口氣,有時也要給些鼓勵。

說真的,如果你認為這員工實在不能給他放鬆,或是你實在找不到地方可以鼓勵他,那是你有問題!是你看不到別人的長處嗎?還是他真的那麼爛?那你又怎會有眼無珠的雇用他呢?

新人教育



雇用新人進來一定要先給予適當的教育,不能任其自生自滅或自由發展。

教育有兩種:一種是工作技能的教育;一種是工作態度的教育。工作技能的教育我不多談,各行各業自有自己的一套,總之是員工該會的技能要教會,不然你要讓他常常呆呆地不知怎麼做事嗎?

工作態度也是一樣重要,甚至更加重要!工作態度包括公司文化的融入。我歡迎有個性、能自己思考、能提供創意的人,那會為公司注入活水,但是讓他發揮之前,還是有些最基本的準則,這些先要嚴格要求。坦白說,準則和創意是有些抵觸的,創意不就是跳脫現有的框框嗎?那怎能有準則?我是認為所有的準則都可以有彈性,但是,新人進來,還是先嚴之後才有彈性的放比較好。由儉入奢易,由奢返儉難。再說,既然是來一起工作的,幾乎不變的準則還是有的,比如說,一定要確實完成工作,為公司創造利益。這總不能變吧!

先嚴格要求,讓他有正確的態度,再給予彈性,讓他有發揮的空間。反過來的話,會很亂,這是經驗談啊!

2011年8月8日 星期一

人人皆可以用

小公司找人才困難的原因之一,是因為一般把人才定義成各方面都很優秀,但是非如此不可嗎?其實一個人,只要他在某個方面,能把你要完成的主要工作做的夠好,那就是人才了

要抱著人人皆有長處可用的心態,而不要盡是挑剔人家哪裡不行。他們要是樣樣行,很優秀,為何要讓你做他們老闆?我們自己尚且不是毫無缺點,很多事也不見得靈光,但是我們都認為自己很有可為,不是嗎?別人也很有發展性啊,就看你怎麼去安排了!

小公司找人才要有方法


小公司找人才不容易!公司小,來應徵的人不怎麼樣,常常很失望!稍微像樣一點的,你請他來,他還不見得願意來。

面對現實吧!這就是實情!對於那些曾在大公司呼風喚雨的人,要知道,有公司的資源(包括它所帶來的希望和形象)時,要找好的人都很容易,沒公司的資源時,人家幹嘛跟你一起苦哈哈的奮鬥?

當然有理由囉,對於那些有能力卻不為大公司效力的小老闆們,心理當然也明白,其實就是自己有個夢!要吸引好的人才進來,就是要在自己的夢裡也給這些人才有個美好的將來。也就是說,小老闆們必需對未來發展有清晰的視野,並清楚的表達給你的千里馬知道,讓他們熱切的想加入你。

2011年6月26日 星期日

獎勵和放縱不同

圖片來源 
連著幾天努力,星期五一鼓作氣,在晚上把星期二要完成的工作完成。該工作很重要,提早完成可以保證解決所有問題,避免最後關頭的壓力和緊張、甚至無法完美完成,這點很好!

但完成後就隨意看影片,連兩天都比平常晚睡很多,加上之前工作量已經增加不少,對身體卻很不好!

我們常說努力之後可以適度的休息或獎勵自己,但卻不該放縱!做平常想做卻不常做的事是獎勵,但無論如何不要做對自己有害的事,這樣你才能走的更遠

2011年6月17日 星期五

像要求部屬般的要求自己


做為獨立工作者、自行創業者或自由工作者(或者那些並非隨時有主管盯著的工作者)來說,能自由安排自己的工作時間是很幸福的。自由,在現代社會是多麼奢侈的一項資產啊!不過就像絕對的權力會讓人腐敗一樣,自由也可能讓人墮落。

有一段時間,包括現在也還經常如此,我會讓自己自由地去做我當下想做的事,但有時這事只是一時心理的舒適而已,不見得最好,有時也不見得心理就舒適,而是某種沈溺、無法控制自己。不管是什麼,所謂的隨心所欲,有時會因為欠缺思考而做出不大正確的事。所以,不能給自己絕對的自由,有時就是必需像要求部屬一般的要求自己、管理自己。

話說回來,我一向認為,過於僵化的限制與管理,會使人喪失創造力與開創探索的精神,所以如何平衡呢?我會按照不同的時間區段來管理自己,一個時間區段是像要求部屬般的要求自己的工作成效,另一個區段則給自己探索和創造的自由。至於何時屬於何種區段?原則上是事先做好決定,但總是可以隨時根據需要而改變。這樣會不會又任由自己墮落了呢?我原則上是每週檢討過去一週的時間分配,確認自己有沒有濫用自由。

我想很多人都跟我一樣,既想要自由,又希望管好自己,不知您覺得這方法還可以嗎?

2011年6月3日 星期五

每位企業家都該看的10段YouTube影片


圖片來源


撰文者:陳品先編譯發表日期:2011-06-02
From: 數位時代

你想成為企業家嗎?那就千萬不能錯過以下包含Steve Jobs、Bill Gates、Richard Branson、哈佛商學院教授、和行銷大師Seth Godin等名人分享洞見的10段影片:
1. 開發內在的CEO

哈佛商學院的Joseph Bower教授,認為CEO就是不斷地學習並精進自己,之後再把範圍擴大到其他人,好在創業公司內建立一個真正的楷模。他也建議採取跨界方式建立人脈,並在公司內倡導創新。
2. 令人驚訝的激勵人心事物

想讓高技術員工免費為你工作,並推出產品到市場並不是不可能,事實上Linux和Wikipedia都曾這麼做過,這部影片就教你如何激勵員工並發揮最大功效,對行銷和業務專業人士來說特別受用。
3. 諾貝爾和平獎得主尤努斯:社會企業經營模式

Muhammad Yunus尤努斯經營一家提供窮人及企業家免抵押品小額貸款的鄉村銀行Grameen Bank,他在這段影片中,敘述自己是如何創造這樣以關注他人為重點,而非只是利潤導向的社會企業經營模式。
4. 綠色企業能否兼顧獲利?

有機食品公司Stonyfield Farm自18年前成為綠色企業以來,每年都成長超過24%,執行長在這段影片中解釋企業如何兼顧環保與利潤,以及為何每個專案都代表一個實踐永續性和創造不同的機會。
5. 行銷大師Seth Godin:能傳播出去的點子就能贏

他在影片中舉例,切片麵包發明17年以來都乏人問津,因為沒有市場,人們也不知道為什麼需要它,一直到一家烘培公司開始行銷這種麵包,才讓它熱門了起來,行銷的重要性由此可見一斑。
6. Donny Deutsch脫口秀中最棒的企業建議

流行休閒鞋領導品牌Skechers執行長,談到區別成功與不成功企業的關鍵是堅持,就像你無法在起跑線就知道路途中何時會出現轉彎一樣,不要停止嘗試就對了。
7. Steve Jobs於2005年對史丹佛畢業生演講

他訴說了自己為何從大學輟學、如何被自己一手創辦的公司開除、以及如何對抗胰臟癌,其中的共通點在於克服不平等的力量,以及在生命低潮中仍然不屈不撓。
8. 如何精巧製作你的300秒電梯行銷或建立人脈介紹

高階管理者教練及公開演說家Kathy McAfee,解釋要正確建立電梯行銷,以極大化時間效率,最重要的就是展現克制,並挑逗聽眾讓他們想知道更多。
9. 億萬富翁的企業家建議

Bill Gates和Richard Branson等白手起家的億萬富翁,分享要成為永續性並長久經營的企業,關鍵在於不只是關注底線,而是要創造擁有一系列堅固價值的以人為本文化。
10. 令人精力充沛的辦公室瑜珈

久坐對人體的傷害其實是很大的,辛苦打拼事業之餘,這部片就教導上班族,如何在有限辦公空間內安靜運動,好讓一天生活更平衡、活力充沛、並有效率。

2011年6月2日 星期四

The secret behind every great shot

Image from here!

本文取自
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/french11/columns/story?columnist=garber_greg&id=6558414
說明了步法、預測能力和其他非擊球技術在網球運動的重要性(我認為在其他運動也是),很值得參考的一篇文章。

By Greg Garber
ESPN.com

The shot gets all the love.

That's the way it is in the bottom-line business of sports. The sweet pass that leads to the overtime goal? The crushing block that springs the running back for a touchdown? The gritty foul balls that allow an at-bat to blossom into a run-scoring double?

No one really cares about what came first. To the eye of the casual fan, this is especially true in tennis.

"Everybody talks about weapons -- the big serve, forehand, backhand," said Sam Sumyk, who coaches No. 4-ranked Victoria Azarenka. "These are isolated shots. Why not movement? It can be a huge weapon, as well. It's the key to every stroke."

Ah, movement. It is the very rhythm, the baseline (so to speak) of the game. Movement is everything that happens before the ball strike. It's how the elite players arrive at the desired point of impact -- hence the term "being on the ball." It allows you to take the ball earlier and put yourself in position to hit your best shots, such as running around the backhand.

"It is much more important than ballstriking, that's for sure," insisted three-time French Open champion Mats Wilander. "Usually, the best players in the world are the best movers.

"Movement is why [Novak] Djokovic is the best player right now. It's why Rafa [Nadal] is the best player ever. It's also why Robin Soderling hasn't won a major, or Tomas Berdych, for that matter."

It's all about the journey. Because it is the most cloying of surfaces -- Did you ever try to run on the beach? -- movement on clay is more important than on any other surface. As the French Open unfurls next week, balls will bounce higher, points will last longer -- and more miles will be logged.

Movement has many components. It is the fitness and flexibility of Novak Djokovic and Kim Clijsters. The jaw-dropping speed of Gael Monfils. The world-class acceleration of Rafael Nadal or Serena Williams or the startling anticipation of Caroline Wozniacki. Or the eerily cat-quiet footwork of Roger Federer.

Some players move better from baseline to net, others from side to side, still others diagonally. Some move better on clay, others on hard courts. The sum of all these moving parts: court coverage.

Jose Higueras, the USTA's director of coaching for elite player development, has coached a number of the world's best movers, including Federer and Jim Courier.

"Because you are very quick doesn't mean you will move quickly on a court," Higueras said from his home in California. "Movement is more about how you perceive the bounce of the ball, assimilate where you are, where the ball is going to be -- and how you are going to get there."

The importance of court coverage

Think of the Olympic sprinter. Pure speed is the only concern. Point A, the starting blocks, to Point B, the finish line. For the 100 meters, it's a straight line, the 200 meters involves a single curve. No major changes of direction; fast-forward only.

Now, consider the degree of difficulty involved in the tennis player's craft: Elevate for a serve, rotate through the ball, check your forward momentum, push off to the left to retrieve the return, stop, execute a swinging backhand, start the feet moving to the right, with chopping steps to get back to the middle of the court, recognize a drop shot, sprint forward, angling to the right, decelerate and chip a forehand into the open court. And that's merely a five-stroke rally. (這就是我喜歡網球勝過跑步或游泳的原因,多變、有趣,動手、動腳、也動腦,需要計畫,也需要臨場應變與反應。)

In the semifinals of the 2009 Australian Open, Nadal defeated Fernando Verdasco in five sets. In a match that consumed 5 hours, 14 minutes -- the longest on record Down Under -- according to the Oradsport tracking mechanism, Nadal ran a total of 2.13 miles. The logistics were staggering; the Spaniard sprinted in all directions, stopping, starting, lunging, jumping, swinging for a total of 1,473 strokes. Then he beat Federer in a five-set final for his first (and only) Australian crown.

Let's see an Olympic sprinter do that.

Todd Martin, who reached the Australian Open in 1994, is one of the game's most cerebral players. He says the technological advances in rackets and strings make movement a critical element.

"The technology -- the advent of polyester strings -- and the skill of the players have promoted just ungodly amounts of topspin without sacrificing pace," Martin said. "The effect is that the court has become much bigger, much wider than it used to be. More balls are in play, and they are tougher to reach.

"As a result, lateral movement is more important now than it's ever been."

Said ESPN analyst Darren Cahill, "If you can't play great defensive tennis, you can't survive. All of the top players, when the shots aren't dropping, they back it up with a Plan B and Plan C."

As ESPN's on-court reporter, Pam Shriver witnesses the speed of the players firsthand.

"Some of these guys are 6-foot-2, and to see their acceleration -- it takes me aback," Shriver said. "The swoosh that they make -- you can almost hear it in the air."

Fitness, the foundation

The best players, particularly on clay, can run for days.

No one preaches fitness -- with such overwhelming success -- more than Pat Etcheberry. He has worked with, among others, Pete Sampras, Monica Seles, Andre Agassi, Courier, Martina Hingis, Jennifer Capriati, Justine Henin, Jelena Jankovic and, currently, Daniela Hantuchova.

"You have to train very hard to play well on clay," said Etcheberry, who also consults for the USTA. "And that means running, lots of running. Nadal does it, Courier and Justine Henin and Sergi Bruguera did it, and it helped them all win the French."

Brad Gilbert, who coached former No. 1 players Agassi and Andy Roddick, thinks Nadal has the best court coverage on clay.

"Rafa's lung capacity is unbelievable," Gilbert said. "The most important things in movement are balance and efficiency. Rafa is not really efficient, but his sheer speed is incredible and he's well-balanced."

Djokovic, according to Gilbert, is the better mover on a hard surface.

"I've never seen a guy with the flexibility that he has," Gilbert said. "He's like a ballerina. He made some insane gets at Key Biscayne -- not only getting there, but doing something with it. On hard courts, no one covers more court than Djoker."

Djokovic's fitness level has been criticized in the past; he has had some notable retirements in the majors. No one was criticizing him when he won his first four tournaments of the year. The difference? Djokovic, who suffers allergic reactions to gluten, has cut out pizza, pasta and breads from his diet.

"I have lost some weight," he told reporters at the recent event in Belgrade, Serbia. "But it's only helped me because my movement is much sharper now."

Speed = commitment = confidence

Nick Bollettieri, only a few months shy of his 80th birthday, has been up since 5 a.m., and he's got more juice than a double espresso.

"You want to know where speed comes from?" Bollettieri says from his tennis academy in Bradenton, Fla. "Let me tell you a story: People see the Williams sisters play and say, 'Holy mackerel, look how quick they are. They just seem to know where the ball's going.'

"Well, 22 years ago, Richard Williams told his daughters back in California, 'I want you to get every ball.' Serena and Venus chase every ball like it's match point. If you see something with your two eyes, and then wait for your brain to react, it's too late. When you play aggressive, there's no room for hesitation. The ball is hit, and you just go."

Shriver sees this in the evolution of Djokovic.

"Speed is a lot about your attitude," she said. "When you're at your most confident, you're at the best of your ability. To be a free-mover, you have to be very clear, no gray areas, otherwise you're inhibited.

"Djokovic, he's always been a great mover. With this newfound confidence, he seems to be reading the court and his speed is even more deadly. That's because he's not tied up, not worried about his serve and what his forehand's going to do. It's all flowing."

Monfils, by a broad consensus, is the fastest player in the sport.

"The guy's speed is off the charts," Gilbert said, "but he plays so far back that he's not efficient enough."

Added Martin, "There's not a ball in the world he can't run down, but a majority of that is raw explosiveness. He does not recognize opportunity when it's there, or else he'd be way, way more successful. He's got a big forehand, backhand is adequate, good serve. But he's playing five, 10 feet behind the baseline and never budges.

"In today's game, you better be explosive and efficient. But if you can't get to where the play is in athletics, you can't play."

Happy, efficient feet

Federer, the No. 1 player for 237 consecutive weeks from 2004 to 2008, has seen Nadal and Djokovic slip past him in the rankings.

But there's still one thing he does better than anyone on the planet.

Listen to Higueras, who tutored Federer in 2008:

"The most economical mover, in terms of how he approaches the ball and sees it, will be Federer. Nadal is incredibly effective, with more force and muscle-driven speed, but Federer is still so fluid.

"His feet are very, very quiet. He never takes more steps than he needs to."

Another piece of the movement puzzle, according to Wilander, is tactical.

"The smart players," he said, "hit shots to their opponents and have a pretty good idea what their corresponding shot will be. That always makes you a little quicker out there.

"Roger Federer obviously knows that Robin Soderling has problems running forward, which is why he picks him apart all the time, with drop shots and short-angled balls. Nadal has an unbelievable ability to catch opponents off guard. He always counterpunches at right time, hits behind guys, throws a curve ball that even David Ferrer can't get to."

Observed Martin: "They all do [footwork] so well now. It's the main reason why there aren't holes in the ground game of the top players. It used to be that one guy moves well to the right but not to the left. Or vice versa. These guys today are just so good from 80 feet away, so adept at handling everything.

"The best players know if you hit certain shots, it's real difficult for your opponent to hit the ball where you don't want them to."

Anticipation (is making me wait)

Perhaps no one in the game anticipates as well as Wozniacki.

"She moves unbelievably," said Sumyk, who has coached Vera Zvonareva and, currently, Azarenka -- both top-five players. "Wozniacki sees and reads the ball really well. The toughest players -- Nadal, Djokovic, Federer -- they touch every ball."

Wozniacki is not blindingly fast, but somehow the 20-year-old Dane seems to get to everything.

"I would say that Caroline is one of the great anticipators of the last decade," Shriver said. "It's amazing how often she guesses right. She'll be seemingly out of the play and, boom, she's back in it."

Bollettieri, who has worked with no fewer than 10 No. 1 players, said that movement is Wozniacki's greatest asset.

"What she does is she gets so many balls back the opponent says, 'Screw you,' and overhits into a mistake," Bollettieri said. "It happens all the time, and it's because she moves so well."

It's one thing to run down a ball, but completely different to do something with it from a compromising position. The best players -- Nadal, Clijsters, Djokovic Serena Williams -- do this consistently.

"Rafa's ability to transition from defense to offense, to make something happen from a ridiculous position, is amazing," Cahill said. "Fed is great at it on clay -- doesn't get enough credit for it. Ferrer is lightning fast and recovers well.

"The best players are recovering before they even finish hitting the shot. In this game, that kind of movement is imperative."