顯示具有 77 運動 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 77 運動 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2012年4月24日 星期二

納達爾掙脫被喬帥壓制的晦氣

RAFA by Rafael Nadal and John Carlin => 網路書店
恭喜 Nadal 終於在 ATP 1000 的蒙地卡羅公開賽 (Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters) 打敗最近連贏他七次的 Djokovic,一吐被壓制的晦氣。為什麼說是晦氣呢? 我主要是想談那個「」,當一個人連續在七次大賽的決賽輸給同一人時,那股氣可想而知有多低迷,你想振作,但對方連贏你七次,他的士氣高昂 (這已經不是你個人的士氣問題,因為對方已經比原來更強大),要超越這堵牆是很困難的。

凡是對抗性的比賽,要改變對方的氣,已經不只是盡全力硬幹的問題,還要做出改變,做出改變,對方就不會一直在他熟悉的舒適狀態,你才能降低對方那股高亢的士氣。他們前次在澳洲公開賽對決後我已經指出這一點 (見 你能做出改變嗎?)。我也指出,Nadal 那場比賽後來終於做出改變,雖然有點晚,但至少讓他重新看到贏球的曙光,果不其然,這次他贏了。

這次他贏有兩個優勢,一是蒙地卡羅公開賽是 Nadal 最喜歡的球場,二是 Djokovic 非常親近的祖父剛過世。優勢是優勢,人生起起伏伏,環境不停變化,每個人總是有時運氣略好、有時略差,長期來說,大家的運氣可能也差不了太多,一切還是看自己怎麼做。Djokovic 也有連勝七場的心理優勢 (常常劣勢的一方會說 I have nothing to lose,其實也是在爭取心裡優勢,把壓力推給對方),而且祖父的過世到底影響有多大? Djokovic 不是照樣一路挺進決賽嗎? 別人怎麼贏不了他? 我想 Djokovic 的確是失去了一些堅持到底的心,所以後來比賽變得一面倒。如果他和以前一樣專注,比賽會更接近,但我相信 Nadal 終於還是會擺脫連敗的陰霾,這樣他才配得上史上最強的球員之一,特別是史上心理方面最強悍的球員之一。

呵呵! 如此才值得我好好閱讀他去年出的自傳 (見上圖),當初他對 Djokovic 還在連敗,如果他克服不了這關,那麼這本書也不用細讀了。現在得好好看看人家到底為甚麼那麼強,即使一路被壓制到幾乎抬不了頭,也終於能夠掙脫!


後記:我當下有三點感想

  1. 無論如何不順,自己不僅不能垂頭喪氣,還要設法讓自己的士氣提升到最高。
  2. 做出改變,如此才能脫離低迷的氣氛,扭轉情勢與士氣。
  3. 等待時機。有時就是時機未到,要有耐心持續努力,在等待的時間中也讓自己更壯大。


2012年1月30日 星期一

你能做出改變嗎?


冠軍都有一顆堅持到底的心,但冠軍也會做出必要的改變。

昨天 Djokovic 和 Nadal 在澳洲網球公開賽上演了一場5盤將近6小時的大戰,最後由 Djokovic 勝出。在去年以前, Nadal 一直是壓著 Djokovic 打,對戰記錄 16:7,從去年開始情況對調,連續7個大賽相遇都是由 Djokovic 勝出,這是個有趣的狀況。我想指出的是,雙方其實都有一顆奮戰不懈的冠軍的心,常常我們說偉大球員和一般職業球員的差距是在心理層面,但是當心理層面都堅強無比卻還不能取勝時,那該怎麼辦?

答案就是改變。或許我的記憶不完全正確,但基本上似乎是這樣的:Djokovic 在去年擁有更好的發球與更快速的抽球,所以開始能夠打敗 Nadal,然後隨著信心的加強,他的技術克制能力就發揮的更好,所以去年連勝6場。Nadal 其實對別人打的很好,所以才能在包括本屆澳網連續7次在大賽的決賽遇到 Djokovic,其實現在的問題出在技術的相剋,Nadal 的反拍雖然能一直把球打回去,但都打的太中間也太短了。別人無法對這個球給予足夠的攻擊,但 Djokovic 可以。此外,Nadal 對別人時,閃身正拍足以控制對手,但 Djokovic 卻不管正反拍都有能力把球回擊到 Nadal 因為閃身而露出的大空檔,使得 Nadal 難以保護他相對較弱的反拍。所以昨天 Nadal 在第2和第3盤打的非常的辛苦,不管鬥志怎樣頑強最終也是被連續攻擊而落敗。那麼他怎能撐到第5盤而且比數很接近呢?

答案還是改變。他終於改變打法了。他加強反拍攻擊,不再只是把球安全的打回去,雖然這樣失誤也會提高,但至少不會讓 Djokovic 予取予求,一但 Djokovic 無法任意攻擊,Nadal 也不會那麼吃力,有利於做出更好的攻擊,同時在不失誤時有更多的對攻也會消耗  Djokovic 的體能,使他無法那麼輕鬆進攻,於是便有更多失誤。當然 Nadal 只是改變戰術願意去打他不習慣的球路,技術本身並無改善,加上一兩個運氣球,最後還是輸了,但不習慣的事只要常做就會習慣了。Djokovic 是贏了,卻無法保證他日後能繼續獲勝,此次他暴露了體能的弱點 (似乎他去年的體能比較好),Ferrer 和 Murray 都只要兩盤就能讓 Djokovic 快吃不消,Nadal 卻用了5盤才讓  Djokovic 感到疲累,這就是他之前過短的反拍讓 Djokovic 一直能輕鬆的攻擊,所以消耗體能不多 (這也是技術相剋,比 Nadal 差的人都能很快辦到的事他就很難辦到---直到他改變球路)。

這場球賽看到了兩位偉大的選手頑強的意志,值得喝采,值得學習。但我想強調的是,除了頑強之外,必要時還是要改變。我確實見過有人有堅強的意志卻無法成事,那不是天命,還沒到那程度,那是他沒做出必要的調整與改變,希望我們都不是那樣!

2012年1月24日 星期二

一切都在於心


我是個網球迷,因工作和其他重要的事,無法像學生時代一有轉播就整天看球,但今年澳網特好在農曆春節,好個初一看球日,這兩天的比賽是個心理素質的教育課。

Makarova 打敗 Serena Williams,大爆冷門。當然 Williams 打的並不好,但 Makarova 堅持不給她好過是原因。頂尖高手失常也是偶而會發生的,如果對手不持續施壓,她們會找回她們的節奏,給你痛擊。Makarova 能保持冷靜一路壓著 Williams 不讓她有機會找回節奏,這就是成功,不是那麼容易做到的,這需要相當的心理素質。她排名56,但這場比賽前已經打敗另兩位種子,我想是開竅了,心理素質已經大大的的提升。果真如此的話,日後排名必定會大幅提升。

前一天,Clijsters 打敗李娜,是在腳踝扭傷後成就的,重點也是在於不放棄。不放棄但身體狀況卻不容許硬拼,所以必須調整戰術,以最有效的方式堅持下去。所以鬥志重要,但也必須聰明的運作,冷靜仍是關鍵。李娜應該要贏,差就差在一時的心理紊亂。

Clijsters 的前男友 Hewitt 也展現了鬥志 (其實都各自結婚了,本不該提,不過公眾人物大家也都知道,重點是這兩人都有顆冠軍的心),雖然是一路被 Djokovic 壓著打,但終於也慢慢提升戰力並趁 Djokovic 稍微失常時拿下一盤,這還是他今年輸掉的第一盤。Hewitt 夠棒了,他的年齡、身體狀況和技術條件早就居於下風,如果不是有一顆強大的心,是無法做到這種程度的,輸也值得喝采。

日本的錦織圭打敗 Tsonga,又是另一個冷門,誰說 underdog 不能贏?我沒看到這場比賽,但它不過是這兩天的另一個註解:Nothing is impossible. 全看你有沒有那顆心

順便對照商業週刊本期的主題:志氣。總之有了心就有希望,心不保證你打敗所有人,我也不覺得打敗別人是有意義的目的。最重要的是活出潛能、活的精彩

2011年6月2日 星期四

The secret behind every great shot

Image from here!

本文取自
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/french11/columns/story?columnist=garber_greg&id=6558414
說明了步法、預測能力和其他非擊球技術在網球運動的重要性(我認為在其他運動也是),很值得參考的一篇文章。

By Greg Garber
ESPN.com

The shot gets all the love.

That's the way it is in the bottom-line business of sports. The sweet pass that leads to the overtime goal? The crushing block that springs the running back for a touchdown? The gritty foul balls that allow an at-bat to blossom into a run-scoring double?

No one really cares about what came first. To the eye of the casual fan, this is especially true in tennis.

"Everybody talks about weapons -- the big serve, forehand, backhand," said Sam Sumyk, who coaches No. 4-ranked Victoria Azarenka. "These are isolated shots. Why not movement? It can be a huge weapon, as well. It's the key to every stroke."

Ah, movement. It is the very rhythm, the baseline (so to speak) of the game. Movement is everything that happens before the ball strike. It's how the elite players arrive at the desired point of impact -- hence the term "being on the ball." It allows you to take the ball earlier and put yourself in position to hit your best shots, such as running around the backhand.

"It is much more important than ballstriking, that's for sure," insisted three-time French Open champion Mats Wilander. "Usually, the best players in the world are the best movers.

"Movement is why [Novak] Djokovic is the best player right now. It's why Rafa [Nadal] is the best player ever. It's also why Robin Soderling hasn't won a major, or Tomas Berdych, for that matter."

It's all about the journey. Because it is the most cloying of surfaces -- Did you ever try to run on the beach? -- movement on clay is more important than on any other surface. As the French Open unfurls next week, balls will bounce higher, points will last longer -- and more miles will be logged.

Movement has many components. It is the fitness and flexibility of Novak Djokovic and Kim Clijsters. The jaw-dropping speed of Gael Monfils. The world-class acceleration of Rafael Nadal or Serena Williams or the startling anticipation of Caroline Wozniacki. Or the eerily cat-quiet footwork of Roger Federer.

Some players move better from baseline to net, others from side to side, still others diagonally. Some move better on clay, others on hard courts. The sum of all these moving parts: court coverage.

Jose Higueras, the USTA's director of coaching for elite player development, has coached a number of the world's best movers, including Federer and Jim Courier.

"Because you are very quick doesn't mean you will move quickly on a court," Higueras said from his home in California. "Movement is more about how you perceive the bounce of the ball, assimilate where you are, where the ball is going to be -- and how you are going to get there."

The importance of court coverage

Think of the Olympic sprinter. Pure speed is the only concern. Point A, the starting blocks, to Point B, the finish line. For the 100 meters, it's a straight line, the 200 meters involves a single curve. No major changes of direction; fast-forward only.

Now, consider the degree of difficulty involved in the tennis player's craft: Elevate for a serve, rotate through the ball, check your forward momentum, push off to the left to retrieve the return, stop, execute a swinging backhand, start the feet moving to the right, with chopping steps to get back to the middle of the court, recognize a drop shot, sprint forward, angling to the right, decelerate and chip a forehand into the open court. And that's merely a five-stroke rally. (這就是我喜歡網球勝過跑步或游泳的原因,多變、有趣,動手、動腳、也動腦,需要計畫,也需要臨場應變與反應。)

In the semifinals of the 2009 Australian Open, Nadal defeated Fernando Verdasco in five sets. In a match that consumed 5 hours, 14 minutes -- the longest on record Down Under -- according to the Oradsport tracking mechanism, Nadal ran a total of 2.13 miles. The logistics were staggering; the Spaniard sprinted in all directions, stopping, starting, lunging, jumping, swinging for a total of 1,473 strokes. Then he beat Federer in a five-set final for his first (and only) Australian crown.

Let's see an Olympic sprinter do that.

Todd Martin, who reached the Australian Open in 1994, is one of the game's most cerebral players. He says the technological advances in rackets and strings make movement a critical element.

"The technology -- the advent of polyester strings -- and the skill of the players have promoted just ungodly amounts of topspin without sacrificing pace," Martin said. "The effect is that the court has become much bigger, much wider than it used to be. More balls are in play, and they are tougher to reach.

"As a result, lateral movement is more important now than it's ever been."

Said ESPN analyst Darren Cahill, "If you can't play great defensive tennis, you can't survive. All of the top players, when the shots aren't dropping, they back it up with a Plan B and Plan C."

As ESPN's on-court reporter, Pam Shriver witnesses the speed of the players firsthand.

"Some of these guys are 6-foot-2, and to see their acceleration -- it takes me aback," Shriver said. "The swoosh that they make -- you can almost hear it in the air."

Fitness, the foundation

The best players, particularly on clay, can run for days.

No one preaches fitness -- with such overwhelming success -- more than Pat Etcheberry. He has worked with, among others, Pete Sampras, Monica Seles, Andre Agassi, Courier, Martina Hingis, Jennifer Capriati, Justine Henin, Jelena Jankovic and, currently, Daniela Hantuchova.

"You have to train very hard to play well on clay," said Etcheberry, who also consults for the USTA. "And that means running, lots of running. Nadal does it, Courier and Justine Henin and Sergi Bruguera did it, and it helped them all win the French."

Brad Gilbert, who coached former No. 1 players Agassi and Andy Roddick, thinks Nadal has the best court coverage on clay.

"Rafa's lung capacity is unbelievable," Gilbert said. "The most important things in movement are balance and efficiency. Rafa is not really efficient, but his sheer speed is incredible and he's well-balanced."

Djokovic, according to Gilbert, is the better mover on a hard surface.

"I've never seen a guy with the flexibility that he has," Gilbert said. "He's like a ballerina. He made some insane gets at Key Biscayne -- not only getting there, but doing something with it. On hard courts, no one covers more court than Djoker."

Djokovic's fitness level has been criticized in the past; he has had some notable retirements in the majors. No one was criticizing him when he won his first four tournaments of the year. The difference? Djokovic, who suffers allergic reactions to gluten, has cut out pizza, pasta and breads from his diet.

"I have lost some weight," he told reporters at the recent event in Belgrade, Serbia. "But it's only helped me because my movement is much sharper now."

Speed = commitment = confidence

Nick Bollettieri, only a few months shy of his 80th birthday, has been up since 5 a.m., and he's got more juice than a double espresso.

"You want to know where speed comes from?" Bollettieri says from his tennis academy in Bradenton, Fla. "Let me tell you a story: People see the Williams sisters play and say, 'Holy mackerel, look how quick they are. They just seem to know where the ball's going.'

"Well, 22 years ago, Richard Williams told his daughters back in California, 'I want you to get every ball.' Serena and Venus chase every ball like it's match point. If you see something with your two eyes, and then wait for your brain to react, it's too late. When you play aggressive, there's no room for hesitation. The ball is hit, and you just go."

Shriver sees this in the evolution of Djokovic.

"Speed is a lot about your attitude," she said. "When you're at your most confident, you're at the best of your ability. To be a free-mover, you have to be very clear, no gray areas, otherwise you're inhibited.

"Djokovic, he's always been a great mover. With this newfound confidence, he seems to be reading the court and his speed is even more deadly. That's because he's not tied up, not worried about his serve and what his forehand's going to do. It's all flowing."

Monfils, by a broad consensus, is the fastest player in the sport.

"The guy's speed is off the charts," Gilbert said, "but he plays so far back that he's not efficient enough."

Added Martin, "There's not a ball in the world he can't run down, but a majority of that is raw explosiveness. He does not recognize opportunity when it's there, or else he'd be way, way more successful. He's got a big forehand, backhand is adequate, good serve. But he's playing five, 10 feet behind the baseline and never budges.

"In today's game, you better be explosive and efficient. But if you can't get to where the play is in athletics, you can't play."

Happy, efficient feet

Federer, the No. 1 player for 237 consecutive weeks from 2004 to 2008, has seen Nadal and Djokovic slip past him in the rankings.

But there's still one thing he does better than anyone on the planet.

Listen to Higueras, who tutored Federer in 2008:

"The most economical mover, in terms of how he approaches the ball and sees it, will be Federer. Nadal is incredibly effective, with more force and muscle-driven speed, but Federer is still so fluid.

"His feet are very, very quiet. He never takes more steps than he needs to."

Another piece of the movement puzzle, according to Wilander, is tactical.

"The smart players," he said, "hit shots to their opponents and have a pretty good idea what their corresponding shot will be. That always makes you a little quicker out there.

"Roger Federer obviously knows that Robin Soderling has problems running forward, which is why he picks him apart all the time, with drop shots and short-angled balls. Nadal has an unbelievable ability to catch opponents off guard. He always counterpunches at right time, hits behind guys, throws a curve ball that even David Ferrer can't get to."

Observed Martin: "They all do [footwork] so well now. It's the main reason why there aren't holes in the ground game of the top players. It used to be that one guy moves well to the right but not to the left. Or vice versa. These guys today are just so good from 80 feet away, so adept at handling everything.

"The best players know if you hit certain shots, it's real difficult for your opponent to hit the ball where you don't want them to."

Anticipation (is making me wait)

Perhaps no one in the game anticipates as well as Wozniacki.

"She moves unbelievably," said Sumyk, who has coached Vera Zvonareva and, currently, Azarenka -- both top-five players. "Wozniacki sees and reads the ball really well. The toughest players -- Nadal, Djokovic, Federer -- they touch every ball."

Wozniacki is not blindingly fast, but somehow the 20-year-old Dane seems to get to everything.

"I would say that Caroline is one of the great anticipators of the last decade," Shriver said. "It's amazing how often she guesses right. She'll be seemingly out of the play and, boom, she's back in it."

Bollettieri, who has worked with no fewer than 10 No. 1 players, said that movement is Wozniacki's greatest asset.

"What she does is she gets so many balls back the opponent says, 'Screw you,' and overhits into a mistake," Bollettieri said. "It happens all the time, and it's because she moves so well."

It's one thing to run down a ball, but completely different to do something with it from a compromising position. The best players -- Nadal, Clijsters, Djokovic Serena Williams -- do this consistently.

"Rafa's ability to transition from defense to offense, to make something happen from a ridiculous position, is amazing," Cahill said. "Fed is great at it on clay -- doesn't get enough credit for it. Ferrer is lightning fast and recovers well.

"The best players are recovering before they even finish hitting the shot. In this game, that kind of movement is imperative."